Weathertightness Design Requirements for new school buildings

We have updated the weathertightness requirements that designers must meet when designing the external envelopes of new school buildings.

Overview

The Weathertightness Design Requirements apply to all new state school buildings, including:

  • extensions and additions that increase the building footprint
  • projects that involve end-of-life replacement or the alteration of roof or wall cladding envelopes of existing buildings.

While the document is primarily aimed at architects and designers, it is also important for those who lead and co-ordinate school design work, such as project managers, boards of trustees and Ministry property personnel.

In some areas the Ministry’s requirements exceed those of the New Zealand Building Code and Acceptable Solution details. These areas include increased roof slopes, additional drained and ventilated wall cavity requirements and increased cladding durability.

The Weathertightness Design Requirements specify the required attributes for systems and materials that make up the external envelopes of new buildings. They also prohibit the use of certain material types and installations where these have been found from experience to not fully satisfy the Ministry’s performance expectations.

Ensure you are using the latest version of the document by directly downloading the document from the link below.

Key documents for all property professionals

DocumentDescription
Weathertightness Design Requirements [PDF, 4.7 MB] This document provides weathertightness requirements for the design of the external envelope of school buildings.
Summary Sheet [PDF, 1.5 MB] This provides a high-level overview of the Weathertightness Design Requirements document

Ministry design review process

To help ensure your design meets Ministry requirements, all designs affecting the building envelope and requiring a Building Consent must be checked by an independent and suitably qualified supplier. Designs where consents are required typically include new buildings, additions and alteration projects.

A review of design is not required where there is no consent requirement e.g. the end-of-life replacement of roof cladding with a comparable material, located in the same position.

Your project will need to follow one of the two design review processes below:

1. School-led projects under $3m

The Ministry will pay for these reviews to be undertaken by its contracted Building Envelope Assessment team. This service will not impact your project budget.

Project Managers or designers are required to submit project documentation for review to: MOEBUILDINGENVELOPEASSESSMENT@argest.com.

Please read through the submission requirements and review processes before submitting design documentation sets for a project:

Building envelope assessment process

Design review process by the Ministry’s Building Envelope Assessment Team

Submission

The plans and drawings will be assessed against the Ministry’s Weathertightness Design Requirements and the building code.

Please submit the following information and documentation for assessment to MOEBUILDINGENVELOPEASSESSMENT@argest.com.

Submission checklist
Item no. 
 a.  General details including:
  • School Name
  • School Address
  • School ID
  • Project Name & detailed description of works
  • Ministry Project ID number
  • Design Company name
  • Name of Ministry Property Advisor
 b. Sufficient specification, construction detailing and referencing of manufacturer’s technical literature to provide contractors with clear and adequate guidance on construction requirements for code compliant construction
 c. General arrangement drawings including site and building location, floor plans, elevations and roof plan with the scope of works identified
 d.

Cross sections through the building envelope 

 e. For the proposed works, large scale details for all flashings, junctions, changes of plane and assembly details at 1:10, 1:5, or 1:2 scale as appropriate, and clearly cross referenced to the general arrangement drawings 
 f. 3D views of complex flashing junctions 
 g. Flashing details of any services penetrations through the external envelope 
 h. Project-specific specification, including proprietary products 
 i. Risk Matrix for E2 AS1 –  for all relevant roof elevations

If you are submitting this information via a Dropbox link or something similar, please make sure it only contains the above requested information.

Assessment and feedback 
    • The Building Envelope Assessment Team will assess the plans and report back to the Project Manager/Designer
    • Any areas of concern will be listed and highlighted on the drawings. If any major concerns are identified, the appropriate Infrastructure Manager will be notified. Solutions to the concerns raised will need to be worked out between the Designer, Project Manager and overseen by the School's Property Advisor & Infrastructure Manager.
Amend highlighted concerns
    • There will not be a resubmission process
    • It is expected that any feedback or changes noted on the report will be taken into consideration and modifications to designs made as required.

2. All Capital Works projects and School-led projects over $3m

This category includes all projects that create new building footprint or alter the external envelopes of existing buildings.

The Project Manager is responsible for organising a weathertightness review from an independent and qualified professional supplier, at the cost of the project.

A project may be subject to a site audit prior to being completed. If so, this will check that concerns have been addressed. 

Weathertightness remediation projects 

Buildings built or modified from 1994 onwards are covered separately by the Ministry’s Weathertightness Remediation programme, which will address any occurrences of weathertightness failure on a case by case basis. Projects to remediate buildings within the programme are reviewed by the Ministry’s Weathertightness Review Panel.

Further information is available on the Weathertightness Remediation process:

Weathertightness Remediation process

Last reviewed: Has this been useful? Give us your feedback